Skip to content

Case study Meta Ads

ATC Cooling & Heating: cost per lead cut from $226 to $18.73

ATC Cooling & Heating is an HVAC company in Kingsport, Tennessee. Its first lead campaign cost $226.30 per lead. After rebuilding the campaign around maximum leads, the cost dropped to $18.73, a 92% reduction.

Client
ATC Cooling & Heating
Industry
HVAC, home services
Market
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Timeline
May 2026 to July 2026
ATC Cooling & Heating case study
$18.73 Cost per lead after the rebuild
-92% Lower cost per lead
14 Leads from the rebuilt campaign
17 Customer chats started

Source: Meta Ads Manager, lifetime account data to 14 November 2026

Overview

The starting point

Background

ATC Cooling & Heating provides AC and heating repairs, tune-ups and installs for homeowners around Kingsport, Tennessee.

The challenge

The first service call and tune-up lead campaign spent $679 for only 3 leads, a cost per lead of $226.30. That is far too high for a local HVAC company.

Goals

  • Bring cost per lead down to a profitable level
  • Get steady service call and tune-up enquiries
  • Keep spend tightly controlled

Approach

What I did

Meta Ads Lead generation Campaign restructure
  1. 01

    Diagnose the old campaign

    Reviewed targeting, form and optimisation settings to find why leads were so expensive.

  2. 02

    Rebuild for maximum leads

    Relaunched the campaign optimised for the highest number of leads.

  3. 03

    Simpler lead form

    Made the form quicker to complete on mobile.

  4. 04

    Service-led offer

    Focused the ads on service calls and tune-ups.

The numbers

Before and after

Cost per lead

-92%
Before$226.30
After$18.73

Leads

+367%
Before3
After14

Results in detail

  • First campaign: $678.91 spent for 3 leads ($226.30 each).
  • Rebuilt campaign: $262.20 spent for 14 leads ($18.73 each) and 14 chats.
  • Overall: 17 leads and 17 chats from $954.72.
Bar chart comparing ATC cost per lead before and after the campaign rebuild
Cost per lead from Meta Ads Manager. Lower is better.

The same budget now buys more than ten times as many leads, which makes Meta a profitable channel for the business.

How to read these numbers

Both figures come from Meta Ads Manager. The first campaign ran from May 2026 and the rebuilt campaign from late June 2026. The rebuilt campaign spent $262.20, so the lead numbers are small but the change in cost per lead is clear.

Tools used

Meta Ads Manager Meta lead forms Google Sheets lead tracker

Want results like these?

Tell me about your business. I will review your website, tracking and ads, and show you where the quickest wins are.

More work

Other case studies

View all work
Chat with me